I found myself agreeing with two letters to the editor in the March 25 edition of The Greenville Advocate. Nona Ennen and Carla Maples both write in to complain about (in Ennen's case) the specifics of the district purchasing the former LPL Financial building for the princely sum of $250,000 and (in the case of Maples) the general fact that the school district seems to have a severe case of the gimmes-- gimme more, gimme better, gimme different, gimme taxes to pay for it.
I agree that the school district has more pressing needs than a brand spanking new office for the superintendent and other administrators. I also think that if a new office was needed, a less expensive solution could have been found than stealing away the LPL Financial building (for a price so high that LPL doesn't even have a building now, they took that price and ran!) Melanie Allyn makes upwards of $100,000 a year, but the vast majority of Greenville-ites do not. In fact, for many people in Greenville, $250,000 would be their salary for five years-- if they're very lucky and make $50,000 a year. For most people in Greenville, that might be 10 or 20 years' worth of salary. Maples points out in her letter that Greenville currently has a high unemployment rate and a low income and our tax dollar stewards-- AKA administrators-- need to therefore monitor their expenditures very carefully, and I concur with her assessment.
Most students in Greenville don't even live in a house that costs $100,000, let alone $250,000. Most teachers don't even break $40,000 or $50,000 even after many years of loyal service to the district. I really have to shake my head at what the school board and administration is doing these days, and I'm glad there are other people in Greenville who have not yet gone off the deep end either and agree that something is wrong with this picture and our tax dollars are being wasted.
We all need to remember this when it comes time to elect the school board-- they did not seek public input on this decision, yet they will ask for a tax raise this year as they do every year. Let's throw 'em out.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
haa.. well, here is anothe remark in regards to the school and funding.. did you all know that according to the school fund reports that the district is paying $900-1200 /month for verizon wireless service for the unit 2 office.. then there is another 25 dollars a month for a sprint pcs wireless service. if we are paying that much for verizon which should be a contract deal of much less, why would they be paying for one other cell phone, and on top of it all, if you were to try calling anyone up there it takes a day or two of calling and calling leaving messages for them to finally call you back. i would think the main purpose of these would be for business at any given time.I found this out plus a whole lot more in regards to the school and their poorly written policies.
Post a Comment